This is Video 1 in the experiment to get better gas milage MPG and save money by using HOMEmade additives that you yourself can make at home with very little effort. I am running some control test for mpg and then experiment with a Homemade gas additive formula and compare and review the differences. (Part 1) DO NOT go adding chemicals to your gas tank. DO YOUR research before you do ANYTHING!! This is NOT a guide! I am NOT a scientest, it is only a video log of my experimentations and …
Tags: Acetone, additives, better, bill, costs, gas, homemade, how, lower, make, money, MPG, reduce, review, Save, syWire, to, WATER4GAS, Xylene
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Yes you can if you have an overdrive unit added or changed the rear end gears.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
well, what was the end additive ratio that you reccommend per 10gal?
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
While this is an impressive test, I would like to know of any adverse effects to your engine/ fuel system. I would also like to see your final analysis and data. Also, what formula did you use to come up with the amount of additive to fuel ratio?
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Id like to see you do the same exact test like 3 different days and times to see if it all stays consistent
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
I would test the effect of acetone on your rubber seals and fuel pump wires! Acetone WILL desolve them over a relitively short time less than 100k miles.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
I have an 04 durango with a 5.7 liter hemi, and it will move right along on level ground at 75mph and tach at about 1200rpms. Modern trannies and torque converters will allow for a partial disengage causing a drop in rpms. When towing my boat at 75mph i’m looking about about 3200 rpms with the torque converter locked up. I used my vehicle cause i would imagine he may have the same 5.7 hemi in his jeep. Made by chrysler corp.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
depends what gear your in. (if your driving stick obviously)
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
This is Bullshit you cant be DRIVING AT 75mph at 1000 rpms show the fucking speed to mf!!!!!!!!!
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Wouldnt this be the same as using seafoam in your gas tank. Its suppose to clean your engine so maybe it would be better but not destroy rubber seals.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
It may be an idea to note the prevailing wind conditions on the days you test. A head or tailwind can skew your results also.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Got all the numbers done .. just gotta get some time to put it all in Vid format
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
looking forward to seeing part 2.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Definantly noticed a difference even after i went back over the test with pure gas. so it did clean the engine and it ran better even after the experiment.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
not yet. but in the small amounts i am using 2-3 ozs in 18 gallons, Just don’t use a high % of acetone unless your trying to clean your engine lol
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Progressive fuel economy improvement over days… sounds likes the injectors and intake valves are progressively getting cleaned by the acetone, giving better fuel atomisation. Try running straight gas again and check your fuel economy.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Has this eaten your seals and other rubber parts like other claim?
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
PLEASE know your what you puting into your tank. Acetone is extreamly corrosive to rubber parts. Depending on the year and make of your vehicle 2 to 3 ounces can be WAY to much if used more then a few times. Yes it will clean out your engine BUT might also ruin the rubber seals and stopers. do NOT use ‘regular’ acetone you buy at homedepot. If your using acetone especially in this dosage get the correct PURE acetone. Best place is a nail salon NOT lowes because it isn’t pure.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Got regular acetone, added about 2-3 ounces and noticed a good increase with the MPG. From 18 to 28 MPG!
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Sweet let me know how it goes. Everything for me has been put on hold for a while. looks like i am having to move.. am continuing with experiment but cann’t make a Vid for a few weeks unfortunantly. don’t forget to Rate / subscribe
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Good experiment Mefoo. I think the control was just fine. Your vehicles fuel system might be returnless or it have a return line in which case fuel is constantly flowing back to the tank. I wouldn’t hold the scangauge in such high regard. I calculates mileage the same way your ECU does. The major factors it looks at is MPH/ODO, engine RPM and most importantly, Injector pulse width. The scan guage is more of a novelty item. Avg is all that matters. Im doing this to my Satrn today w/xylene alone.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Mefoo007 (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam Reply Please anyone watching take info and data with a grain of salt. The comment above is absolutly correct. This initial data is completly experimental i am just showing the readings as they come
. I am not trying to keep anypart of this recipe secret it is published knoledge. Xylol(xylene) & PURE Acitone. just trying out dif combos now. right now it looks like 2 1/2oz Zylene with 1/2oz Acitone per 10 gal. A device were i can control how lea
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Just got back from NC and VA. Yea this sounds like it will get me closest to decent comparison. Bought the 5gallon gas tank today to get me to gas station when empty. going to run test from full to empty and compare from there. This will be in part 3 of 3. part 2 will be quick as far as some adujustments to the mixture to make it less detrimental to rubber parts. also will run through the xylol and the acitone properties.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
don’t get me wrong, I like scangauges, I just would be skeptical about trusting their data as concrete for the testing you are working on. I really think I would go with just my odometer (which is required by law to be accurate within a pretty good range) and calculating the total fuel burned in each test. its a little extra number crunching for the researcher, but I think I would trust the data more than data generated by an external devise. good instrumentation is expensive!
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Thanks for the fore warning. I thought the new scan gauges had a few more bells and whistles with the data dumps of the new computers but i could be wrong. Have a good sugestion to get a better reading?
June 30th, 2009 at 10:12 am
don’t waste money on a scangauge, just determine the total fuel capacity of your tank, run it empty, then when you fill it again, mathematically determine the total fuel added! I do not consider a scangauge any more reliable for true scientific evaluation than I do the $1000 dollar plus ecu built into your car, many errors can occur with simple instrumentation! just measure actual fuel burned! your cars odometer and simple calculation will satisfy most anyone I know.